clarifying on CNN

CNN employs a blonde english woman to read their weather -- this does not offend, she is not pretending she isn't english -- she isn't trying to practice a fraud... however, CNN uses around 3 anglo-australians that definitely offend... they are australian when it suits them, and then, when that doesn't suit them in australia, they are english.... they would have australians like myself, born and raised in australia, grovel to their mentally ill queen and race that practices delusional thinking like 'majesty' for their little old queen..... they are very offensive, machiavellian personalities.... there is no room for error in this judgement.... unfortunately, these types thrive on the suffering and victimization they perpetuate on others unlike themselves (ie., not english) - whenever they can get away with it

on these terms, if CNN presents us Stan Grant, it's not offensive, it's a kind of pro-acttivism... however, at heart, the multi-european-dna-ed-forsakers-of-their-fathers'-names-for-the-sake-of-anglo-saxon-names-americans also put Stan Grant there a a kind of Jesuit like condescension... that's just sad... the irony is that Stan Grant, regardless of having an anglo-saxon name, and regardless of being targeted as a kind of pro-active-anti-racism-token is actually fit to do this kind of work

what's really sad is that CNN is reinforcing the racism exercised by australians of english descent within australia itself... this is really criminal....

CNN rounds this out by using a communist chinese in communist china to highlight what it is they want to (subconsciously highlight) the economic relationship between english people (australian or otherwise) and communist chinese in selling/buying massive amounts of raw minerals unearthed in australia and consumed in china by the communist chinese

when not offending with a kind of Jesuit condescension... what is it CNN believes in? men are evolved from monkeys? people with anglo-saxon names are a majority-winner folk? is this how DUMB the market is? CNN's market? the answer is yes

pierce morgan offends becoz he is a self-confessed phone-tapper and has no regard for people's privacy... richard quest does not offend at all and does a good job.... all anglo-ostraylians on CNN most definitely are offensive to behold, with possibly the only exception being in Anna Coren, and that goes the same if they're part scottish or welsh or whatever... Becky is also a offensive but becoz she is a douche-bag --- brits like her that offend offend because the english are by nature partly machiavellian, this is to say that the construction 'british' is a fallacy - scotland is a completely separate nation to --- Becky comes across as someone incapable of thinking for herself and toes the nationalistic british line of her nation -- that her queen is 'majestic' (delusional thinking/potential schizo-affective disorder) - that scotland added to england = 'great britain' (again, delusional with tendency towards homosexuality)

surprisingly - the bbc, who are essentially a communist/socialist movement, being taxpayer funded, are much less offensive than all the english people at CNN with the exception of quest, grant (who is only part anglo) and the blonde weather woman... coren seems like an agreeable but confused dimwit who is incapable of realizing the first thing about geography or geo-politics.... the english in general are prone to lying and manipulation when talking geo-politics, normally with a view to financial gain -- good luck with that in the age of climate change my greedy english friends