sunshine

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQKcpmnRsP0&feature=related

greetings earthlings.... i finally woke up early and started my new experience of vitamin d enriched sunlight -- albeit wintertime sunlight....... this is due to not driving a taxi during nightshift which my body now would not tolerate as there is some kind of problem with the muscles around the lower back (to the right) -- any driving now aggravates this area

my replacement work is pitiful....... telemarketing -- this is just a badge of failure as far as the writer is concerned...... how easily it will be tolerated will be seen in ensuing days.... so far it is actually two telemarketing jobs

telemarketing is a sign of failure...... telemarketing can scientifically prove that time does not exist per ce, and is rather a perception of consciousness, just as is a hot woman in your dreamstate (a perception of consciousness)....

failure is an inevitability of (basically any) human condition at some point

with regard to the science of time distortion -- telemarketing uniquely SLOWS DOWN time so that 4 hours spent telemarketing can stretch out slowly, while playing dumb facebook games for girls and watching fox news can make time fly by....

it's all a matter of perception.... but certainly, anyone with a job in the media is doing better than telemarketing -- so congratulations (c*%t)

wondering about einstein's theory of relativity: e=mc2 --- this is to say that 'energy' is equal to the speed that light travels at (multiplied by itself or 'squared') multiplied by mass

certainly, this theory is one that stands INDEPENDENTLY of human observation... so that it wouldn't matter if a human observer was suffering and perceiving time to pass slowly or having a gay old time (eg., like in the flintstones) and perceiving time to pass or travel quickly

where is the reference made to time in e=mc2 --- there is none, only reference to speed (the speed of light which is more or less a definite although a subjective definite as light as warped when traveling to black holes and we still do not know how light travels anyway particles or waves or both)..... is speed the same as time? what is the relationship between speed and time? if light 'bends' when approaching a massively powerful 'black hole' how does its speed change accordingly?

is it possible to travel faster than the speed of light? certainly it must be.... for example, if i watch people in nyc on tv live, really, i am getting the image at the speed of light (almost) due to the rapid nature of telecommunications.... but say we were to communicate telepathically with spock while he is in some other galaxy (with chewbacca).... while light would travel back to earth from the other galaxy in years or centuries, thought transference would occur must faster than the speed of light... certainly this must be possible (thought transference to other galaxies)

what is light? it travels by waves and particles, but what is it? it can emit heat but so can dark matter.... light is what we call certain vibrations that are eyes perceive that are a small band on the electromagnetic spectrum -- but even bats do not need this to travel with

in fact, after spending 50 hours a week driving for 2 years -- and not having had a single accident with another car.... not even once.... despite many times having to take my eyes of the road for many moments, certainly a sixth sense is developed that acts like a kind of radar

how can matter travel faster than light? if we agree that thought can travel faster than light, how is it that the matter that comprises thought (transmuted from air and food) can travel faster than light? certainly Soul can travel faster than light but does Soul need to travel at all, since it is everywhere


according to memory, the speed of light travels at 300,000 kps... so if the sunlight takes 10 minutes approx. to arrive to faraway Earth, then multiply 300,000kilometres by 600 (seconds) and this should give the distance between sun and Earth -- but if time does not exist -- then how can be absolutely say that light takes x seconds to travel x distance? we cannot. this must be why einstein called his problem the theory of relativity and not the theory of abolutivity.... because in absolute terms, it is self-evident that it is possible to travel faster than the speed of light -- the question then becomes, WHAT? is travelling aster than the speed of light (matter, Soul, Chi-energy (prana or life force)) or all of the above........... also, if time is not real (and it seems obvious that it isn't, given the states of consciousness we experience in sleep compared to waking life and drug-induced states)....... then values for the speed of light are not real....... that is why light cannot travel away from a black hole - it is sucked in

black holes have incredibly dense mass -- they also have massive amounts of energy -- the relationship in e=mc2 of mass and energy is: e/m = c2 or energy divided by mass = speed of light squared....... the speed of light around a black hole is a negative or a nothing (either less than zero or zero) --- squaring a negative number gives us a positive result: e.g., -2$ (2$ debt) squared = $4.... not -4$..... so if light is travelling backwards (getting sucked in or bent or warped around a black hole) we know this is because of a very high value of m (mass) in the black hole........

it's a hard problem to understand

the black hole has a relatively small mass with regard to its energy..... if light is sucked into the black hole at what speed does it travel? what we call light is a form of matter (it is not Soul and it is not chi-energy or prana - life force) Soul may manifest some divine form of light however this is not what we usually call light which is purely a material/matter manifestation..... e/m = c2.... the relationship of light to a black hole is funny, at some point, the light is sucked in so hard it is NEUTRALIZED: it no longer travels at all, therefore c2 = zero.... if c2 = zero (light is not travelling anymore, ceases to exist) then e/m must also equal zero........ this then means that the energy of the black hole equals zero as the mass would be something....... how can we say the black hole has no energy? it doesn't make sense.......... probably the energy has a negative value then.... too hard to understand.... black holes sure seem pretty cool though, they seem to be the opposite of suns or stars

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole

so what would happen if we strategically placed a black hole behind our own sun, in such a way that it were able to affect the speed our sun's light travelled at, without actually sucking our sun into it?